[GFT] GFT Technologies: The Bank Whisperers
A German IT firm walks the tightrope between legacy systems and AI dreams
Origins
In 1987, a small technology company opened its doors in Germany's Black Forest - a region where precision engineering is a cultural obsession. This is the place that gave the world cuckoo clocks and Mercedes-Benz engines, where 'good enough' has never been good enough, and where engineering is treated with almost religious reverence. Imagine Silicon Valley's 'move fast and break things' culture, but reverse every word of that motto. Having personally started my career as a software engineer south of Stuttgart, I can attest to that, 100%.
The company's rather bureaucratic name - Gesellschaft für Technologietransfer (Society for Technology Transfer) - reflected its academic origins, spawning from a university technology transfer centre. Like many tech success stories, this one starts with a professor and an ambitious young engineer: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Schönemann provided the initial foundation, while a 29-year-old Ulrich Dietz brought the entrepreneurial drive. Keep that name in mind.
The early years saw GFT developing custom software solutions, with Dietz gradually taking control - 75% ownership by 1989, full ownership by 1991. Their first product, GRIT, launched in 1990, marking GFT's entry into business process management software.
The company grew steadily through the 1990s, riding Germany's post-reunification tech wave and building systems for heavyweight clients like Deutsche Post. When GFT went public in 1999, it was already clear that Dietz had bigger plans than just being another German software house.
The real transformation came in 2001, when GFT acquired emagine, a Deutsche Bank IT subsidiary, along with its 500-strong development centre in Barcelona. This move reads like a textbook example of how European tech companies evolved in the early 2000s - from national software providers into global IT service organizations. The Deutsche Bank connection proved particularly significant, embedding financial services deep in GFT's DNA. While many tech companies chase the latest trends, GFT found its niche in the complex, regulation-heavy world of banking IT.
Today, with over 9,000 employees across multiple continents, that Black Forest startup has become a key player in financial technology transformation. Their clients still include some of the same banks they worked with 20 years ago - in finance, after all, institutional memory is its own kind of technology.
How do they make money
At its simplest, GFT Technologies gets paid to help banks update their old computer systems.
You might wonder why banks don't just update their systems themselves. Well, imagine trying to change the engine of a plane while it's flying - that's basically what modernizing a bank's IT systems involves. Picture a bank running critical software from the 1950s (yes, the era when computers filled entire rooms and COBOL was cutting-edge) that needs to work with modern apps and cloud services - GFT's engineers make that happen. Side-note, many all of those banks, still have decades old software running every single day. Talking from experience again. Back to GFT.
The model gets more sophisticated when you look at where these employees sit. While GFT sells its services in expensive markets like Germany and the UK (where banks pay premium rates), many of their developers actually work from places like Brazil and Poland where wages are lower and the coffee is arguably better. This geographic arbitrage is key to their profitability - they maintain local offices with senior staff who speak the language and understand banking regulations, while leveraging lower-cost development centres for the heavy lifting. The numbers: 83% of revenue goes to personnel costs, but they still maintain a 19% gross margin and about 9% operating margin.
Let's break down where the money actually comes from, because this gets interesting. The revenue mix shows three distinct business lines.
The biggest chunk (53%) comes from "Platform Modernization" - helping banks move their systems to the cloud and build modern interfaces.
Then there's "Engineering Services" (39%) which includes maintaining these systems and handling regulatory compliance.
The smallest but fastest-growing segment is "AI & Data" (8%), where they're building custom artificial intelligence tools for banks.
The client base is heavily concentrated in financial services - banks represent 73% of revenue, insurance companies another 16%, and various industries the remaining 11%.
GFT is now trying to evolve beyond just selling developer time. They're building their own products like the AI.DA marketplace and forming partnerships with tech giants like NVIDIA and AWS. The goal seems to be transforming from a pure services company into more of a technology platform business - which could mean higher margins if they succeed. Recent wins with major banks like Bancolombia and Itaú suggest clients are buying into this vision. It's like they're trying to move from being a construction contractor to being an architect who designs reusable blueprints - harder to pull off, but potentially more profitable if it works.
Numbers
Let's start with the simple stuff. GFT makes €802 million in revenue. For every €100 of work they do, they keep about €9 as profit. 9%. That's okay, not amazing.
Here's where we need to dig deeper. Growth tells an interesting story. Total revenue grew 10% last year - sounds good. But strip away their acquisitions, and organic growth was only 2%. Like a tech company buying corner stores to show expansion.
They employ 9,130 people, generating about €88,000 per employee. Lower than top-tier consultancies, but there's a reason: GFT runs a "nearshore" model. They hire developers in places like Brazil and Poland, where talent costs less but quality remains high.
Speaking of operations, they run tight. Their utilization rate is 91.4% - meaning their consultants are billing clients 91.4% of available time. In consulting, that's like running a restaurant with nearly every table full, every night. Feels good, doesn’t it?
The balance sheet shows discipline. Their net debt is only 0.37 times their EBITDA (that's earnings before accounting adjustments). Translation: they could pay off all their debt with less than half a year's earnings. Conservative for a tech company.
What does cash flow tell us? Well, they convert 84% of their accounting profit into actual cash - not ideal. The gap? They're waiting longer to get paid. Their average customer takes 83 days to pay bills. Welcome to enterprise software.
Here's a telling detail: Their biggest client, Deutsche Bank, represents 15% of revenue. In banking tech, that's not a simple customer relationship - it's a strategic partnership that opens doors.
They're investing in their future. R&D spending is €18.19 million, or 2.3% of revenue. For a services company, that's significant. They take profits from selling time, and use it trying to build products.
The market values GFT at about 7 times EBITDA. Their bigger competitors trade at 15-20 times. Either the market's missing something, or there's a reason for the discount. That's the central question for investors.
Some final numbers worth watching: Their order backlog is €386 million - about six months of work already lined up. Their contract assets doubled last year while receivables dropped 19% - suggesting they're structuring deals differently, perhaps more favourably.
The staff cost ratio increased to 83.3% of revenue. In an industry where your main asset walks out the door every evening, that's the number that ultimately determines your destiny. The staff cost ratio of 83.3% is the critical number here. GFT makes money by having skilled engineers build things for banks - they pay their people X and charge clients Y, hoping to keep the difference as profit. Ok. When that ratio rises, it means the spread is getting squeezed. GFT has long played a clever game: hiring top tech talent in places like Brazil and Poland, where costs are lower, then selling those skills to German and British banks at a discount to what locals would charge. But now wages in those markets are rising faster than what banks will pay, pushing that ratio up 2 percentage points in just one year. And while traditional IT staffing firms might try to simply pass on higher costs, GFT is also investing heavily in building its own banking software products and AI solutions - think standardized tools that many banks could use rather than custom-built systems for each client. That investment shows up in costs today but might help them escape the staffing margins trap tomorrow. It's the tension at the heart of their story: managing current margins while funding their evolution.
People
Who owns GFT Technologies? At first glance, it's a public company - shares trade on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. The Dietz family holds about 36% of the shares, with founder Ulrich Dietz personally controlling 26.3%. Free float makes up the remaining 64%. Decisions can't happen without considering other shareholders, yet the founder's vision shapes direction.
The institutional investors tell their own story. Capital Research owns about 5%, Norges Bank 3%. When the Norwegian sovereign wealth fund buys your stock, you're probably doing something right.
Who runs it? GFT is in the middle of a leadership transition. After 22 years, CEO Marika Lulay is stepping down, with Marco Santos taking over. Santos brings an Americas background and champions AI initiatives. CFO Jochen Ruetz becomes Deputy CEO - because nothing says "serious about growth" quite like putting your numbers guy second in command.
Think of it as a three-layer cake of management: The Administrative Board sets strategy, regional heads run operations across 20+ markets, and practice leaders drive technical execution. This structure matters because GFT's business requires both local relationships and global delivery capabilities.
Who works there? GFT employs 11,304 people plus 1,232 contractors. The geographic distribution: 55% work in Americas/UK/APAC, with major hubs in Brazil (3,281 people) and Spain (2,209). The recent Sophos acquisition added 1,391 employees in Colombia - when you can't hire talent fast enough, sometimes you just buy the whole company.
These numbers reveal active global footprint management. The workforce maintains a 90% utilization rate - a key metric in IT services indicating billable hours. The technical talent runs deep: 3,000+ engineers trained in AI (as the latest investor’s presentation boasts), with 800 working on product evolution. Personnel costs eat up 68% of revenue (€313.56M), showing this is fundamentally a people business. The 11% attrition rate suggests reasonable talent retention in a competitive tech market.
Competition & the Moat(?)
Who competes with GFT Technologies? The simple answer: everyone and no one. Let me explain.
First, you have the tech giants' consulting arms. AWS Professional Services, Google Cloud's consultants - they're all chasing the same cloud transformation projects. When a bank wants to modernize its systems, these players show up with their cloud platforms and armies of consultants.
Then there are the Indian IT powerhouses: Tata Consultancy Services, HCL, Infosys. They bring scale and lower costs. Talking about thousands of engineers ready to tackle any project. They're like the Walmart of IT services - huge selection, competitive prices.
Local heroes form another layer. In each key market - Germany, Spain, Brazil - GFT faces regional players who know the territory and speak the language. These firms understand local banking regulations and have deep relationships with mid-sized banks.
"In business, I look for economic castles protected by unbreachable moats."
- Warren Buffett
So where's GFT's moat? A few places, actually.
The first is what I'll call the "legacy code monastery" effect. GFT's engineers have spent years learning the old banking systems - COBOL, mainframes, core processing. This deep understanding of ancient legacy systems creates real switching costs.
If you think about it, this isn't about competing with AWS or TCS - it's about being the translator who speaks both old banking dialect and modern tech vernacular. GFT isn't trying to outmuscle the giants; they're trying to be the local guide who knows where all the legacy system bodies are buried.
Geographic focus provides another edge. GFT isn't trying to be everywhere. They've built strong positions in specific markets - Germany, Spain, Brazil. In these territories, they combine local presence with global delivery capabilities. Think of it like having both a neighbourhood mechanic who knows your car and access to a global parts network.
Client relationships form the third moat. Banks don't switch IT providers lightly. The risks are too high, the systems too critical. GFT maintains long-term relationships - their top 10 clients represent 43% of revenue. That stickiness matters.
The company hasn't really lost moats over time. Instead, they're building new ones around AI and cloud capabilities. Their recent partnerships with NVIDIA and AWS, plus their own AI Impact product, show they're evolving with the market.
Mr. Market
The stock market has opinions about GFT Technologies, and those opinions have changed rather dramatically. Let's examine what Mr. Market thinks.
For years, GFT traded like a stable German IT services provider, bouncing between €8-12. Then 2021 happened. Suddenly this stolid banking tech consultant was worth €48 per share. A 500% rally tends to get your attention. Markets can change their mind quickly though. Today GFT trades at €22.
What happened? Well, the story changed. In 2021, anything with "digital transformation" in its pitch deck commanded growth stock multiples. Banks were throwing money at technology upgrades. GFT, with its deep banking relationships and nearshore development centres, looked perfectly positioned.
Then interest rates rose, bank tech budgets tightened, and markets remembered that IT services businesses have this annoying habit of requiring actual humans to do the work. The growth stock premium evaporated.
Yet today's €22 price reveals something interesting. It's far below the peak, but still meaningfully above pre-2021 levels. The market acknowledges GFT isn't just the same company anymore. They're pushing into AI, expanding geographically (hello, Sophos acquisition), and building actual products instead of just selling developer hours.
The valuation tells us markets are... sceptical. GFT trades at 12.8x earnings while Accenture commands 27.3x. That's quite a discount for a company growing revenue 10% annually with stable margins. The market seems fixated on one number: 73% of revenue from banking clients. It probably has to do more with where the banking technology spending cycle is at the moment.
Recent price action adds texture. Several rallies attempted in 2024, none held. Q3's weaker demand and reduced guidance didn't help. The Sophos acquisition - their largest ever - created some integration uncertainty. Yet the stock finds support around €20-22. Markets hate uncertainty, but they also hate missing transformations.
Here's a nuance worth considering: GFT's revenue has actually grown since the 2021 peak. Their order backlog is up 26%. Margins remain stable at 8.8%. The market isn't pricing a deteriorating business - it's pricing uncertainty about their evolution from banking IT vendor to AI-enabled transformation partner.
Current valuation says: "Show me, don't tell me."
Markets want proof GFT can execute their AI and modernization strategy while maintaining profitability. Their partnerships with NVIDIA and AWS, plus early traction with their AI Impact product, suggest potential. But markets remember how many IT services firms promised transformation and delivered merely change orders.
The price today reflects neither the pessimism of their pre-2021 trading nor the euphoria of the 2021 peak. It reflects a company in … well, transition (as usual), with real assets and capabilities, facing both opportunity and execution risk. In other words, exactly the kind of situation markets love to debate. And us investors as well. Let’s be honest.
Bear Thesis
The simple bear case for GFT Technologies goes like this:
A European IT services company, heavily dependent on banking clients, is trying to transform itself through debt-funded acquisitions and an AI pivot, right when its core markets are weakening.
You've heard this story before, and it rarely ends well.
Dig a bit deeper though, and the picture gets more interesting (and more concerning). GFT's organic growth has collapsed to 2%, with its traditional strongholds - the UK, US, and Asia-Pacific markets - showing double-digit revenue declines. When a company's core business starts shrinking, that's usually when the financial engineering begins.
And right on cue, we have a €79.45 million acquisition of Colombian IT firm Sophos, funded almost entirely with debt. GFT went from a comfortable €4.39 million net cash position to €84.18 million in net debt. The price tag included €62.86 million in goodwill - that's accountant-speak for "we paid way more than the tangible assets were worth." When nearly three-quarters of your purchase price is goodwill, you're making quite a bet on future synergies.
Speaking of accounting, there's some financial sorcery happening in Brazil. A €10 million tax provision release is making 2024 earnings look better than they really are. Strip that out, and the picture changes dramatically. Even more telling? Management recently cancelled planned bonus accruals for 2025 due to "lower growth and profitability" expectations. When a company cancels bonus provisions, that's usually not a sign of optimism about the future.
Meanwhile, costs are creeping up in a way that should worry investors. The ratio of personnel expenses to revenue has expanded to 83.3% from 81.3%. That might not sound like much, but in a people business like IT services, margins are everything. GFT has been trying to control this through "capacity adjustments" - corporate euphemism for layoffs - to the tune of €6.9 million in the first nine months of 2024, up from €3.6 million in the same period last year. This isn't just a margin issue - it reveals a fundamental challenge of trying to transform while maintaining profitability. The company is essentially attempting to build products with the cost structure of a services business. History suggests this rarely works without a painful transition period.
Now, GFT is trying to reinvent itself as an AI player. They've announced partnerships with NVIDIA, Google Cloud, and AWS in rapid succession. They've launched their own AI product called "GFT AI Impact." Ok. But peek under the hood, and you'll find only 10 clients and "20 pilots and proof of concepts." In the enterprise software world, "proof of concept" often translates to "trying it out for free."
The company maintains a surprisingly high utilization rate of 91.4%. That sounds impressive until you realize it's achieved through those aforementioned "capacity adjustments." Like keeping your restaurant's occupancy rate high by closing half the tables.
Here's what really ties this bear case together: GFT is attempting multiple major transformations simultaneously - integrating its largest-ever acquisition, pivoting to AI, pushing into manufacturing, all while its core banking business (73% of revenue) faces headwinds. That's like trying to change engines, repaint the plane, and train a new pilot, all during flight.
The market seems to be catching on. The stock is down 40% year-to-date, and analysts are getting nervous - Hauck Aufhäuser just removed GFT from their "Alpha List" in November. Current trading at 12.8x 2024 earnings might seem reasonable, but those earnings include that one-time Brazilian tax benefit. The real multiple is higher, and likely to expand as the underlying earnings power becomes clear in 2025.
The kicker? Currency headwinds in GFT's growth markets are intensifying. The impact of foreign exchange swung from -€0.9 million to -€1.5 million year-over-year. That's particularly problematic given their recent big bet on Colombia through the Sophos acquisition.
When you put it all together, you get a company stretching its balance sheet and strategic bandwidth at exactly the wrong time, while using financial engineering to mask deteriorating fundamentals. The market has started pricing in these concerns, but with earnings reality likely to hit in 2025, there might be more downside ahead.
Bull Thesis
The core bull case for GFT centres on valuation asymmetry. We're looking at a company trading at 0.75x sales versus a sector at 8x. Usually, such discounts exist for good reasons. Here, the evidence suggests otherwise.
Let's dissect the transformation metrics. Revenue per employee has stayed stable through their growth phase - a key indicator that scale isn't compromising efficiency. The margins tell a similar story: EBIT expanded from 6.2% to 8.8% while revenue doubled. That's not easy in IT services.
The technical differentiation appears substantive. Their AI platform documentation specifically references integration with all three major LLMs - not just capabilities, but actual marketplace presence on Microsoft Azure and AWS, with Google pending.
The financial progression deserves closer scrutiny. The revenue CAGR from 2019-2023 was 17%, accompanied by improving cash conversion. Operating cash flow guidance of €40-45M for 2024 implies continued strong conversion despite the growth investment phase.
Geographic expansion offers another angle. The Brazil operation grew 19% in local currency last quarter (13% in euros). More importantly, they're maintaining pricing power - the margin profile hasn't deteriorated despite currency headwinds.
The order backlog deserves particular attention: 26% year-over-year growth. Even excluding the €50M Sophos contribution, the organic backlog growth suggests acceleration. The management transcript specifies this is heavily weighted to the next two quarters, providing near-term visibility.
Client metrics show evolution beyond the headline numbers. The "qualified client" threshold is €100K in annual revenue - not a trivial hurdle. Growing this base by 30% year-over-year (57 versus 44) indicates market share gains even as enterprise tech budgets tighten.
R&D intensity provides another data point: from €2.8M in 2019 to €18.2M in 2023. As a percentage of revenue, that's still modest by software standards but significant for an IT services firm pivoting toward product-led growth.
The balance sheet remains conservative through this transition. A 41% equity ratio and net debt at 0.8-0.9x EBITDA leaves room for continued investment. The Sophos acquisition financing (€40M long-term facility) appears prudently structured.
In essence, we have a technical transformation with improving economics, backed by conservative financing, trading at a material discount to peers. The market appears to be missing the inflection point in the business model.
So what do we make of all this?
Well, after wading through all those numbers and strategies and market opinions, here's what it comes down to: GFT is trying to pull off the classic IT services magic trick - transforming from "we'll send you some developers" into "we'll solve your problems with our technology." As we said, like watching a construction company try to become an architect.
The thing is, they might actually be doing it right. They're not abandoning their day job of keeping banks' ancient systems running while they chase the AI dream. They're building new capabilities piece by piece, keeping the lights on with their existing business. And they've got those deep relationships with banks - the kind you get from spending decades untangling their technological spaghetti.
At its core, this is a simple story about a well-run company trying to become a better company.
The bear case is that they're stretching themselves too thin and the transformation won't work.
The bull case is that the market is pricing them like the company they were, not the company they're becoming.
Looking ahead to Q1 2025, there are three key things to watch. First, how European banks' tech budgets shake out amidst the ongoing rate environment - early whispers suggest some trimming. Second, the Sophos integration milestones - they're promising significant cross-selling opportunities by March. Third, their AI Impact platform's commercial traction - they've hinted at major client announcements coming in February.
The wild card? The banking sector's accelerating push toward AI transformation. If the recent JPMorgan earnings call is any indicator (they just announced a $12 billion tech budget for 2025), the big banks are getting serious about modernization. That tide might lift GFT's boat - if they can keep their balance sheet steady while catching the wave.
LEGAL DISCLAIMER AND DISCLOSURE
© 2025 Silba. All rights reserved.
This analysis is for informational purposes only. The content represents the views and opinions of the author, based on publicly available information. While we strive for accuracy, we make no representations or warranties regarding the completeness or accuracy of the information presented.
This analysis is not investment advice. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. The author may hold positions in securities mentioned. Future performance of any investment discussed cannot be guaranteed.
All financial figures, unless otherwise noted, are approximations based on publicly available information. Readers should verify all claims, statistics, and analytical processes independently. The information contained herein is not intended to be a complete analysis of any security, company, or industry mentioned.
Market conditions change. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investments mentioned may not be suitable for all investors. Readers should conduct their own due diligence and consult with professional financial, legal, and tax advisors before making any investment decisions.
By accessing this analysis, you agree that neither Silba nor its affiliates bear any responsibility for investment decisions you make based on this information.