[ITRN] Crime Pays, Predictably: Ituran, Israel's Subscription Security Machine

Where police fail, Ituran thrives — building a utility business on society's broken promises

if you stumble on any finance jargon, feel free to consult the Glossary

4th of May UPDATE: Mention Bringg asset, thank you

Critical Conditions

Origins

In the late summer of 1994, Tel Aviv drivers faced a brutal equation: purchasing a vehicle delivered a 1-in-33 chance of it being stolen within a year. Insurance premiums—when coverage was available at all—consumed nearly 15% of the average salary. Yet somewhere in the industrial outskirts, crates of military-grade tracking equipment sat unused, their potential as dormant as their original buyers' imagination.

Izzy and Eyal Sheratzky, father-and-son partners in an insurance investigation firm, operated at the intersection of human anxiety and mathematical reality. Their days consisted of documenting theft claims while watching premiums spiral beyond affordability.

When they discovered these surplus tracking systems—originally developed by defence contractor Tadiran through a joint venture with American firm Teletrac—they recognised something profound. The military had built a solution to a civilian problem, then shelved it when the obvious buyers couldn't stomach the price tag.

The technology itself was remarkable. Radio frequency tracking—precursor to today's GPS systems—could pinpoint a vehicle to within metres, even when thieves attempted to jam signals. But Tadiran's sales approach had created its own obstacle: asking insurance companies to purchase (probably expensive) tracking units required capital that simply didn't exist in their budgets.

Within months of Tadiran's failed launch, Izzy Sheratzky negotiated to acquire the technology for $250,000 plus a commitment to purchase components. The true innovation, however, lay not in the acquisition but in what followed.

Instead of perpetuating Tadiran's hardware-sales model, the Sheratzkys reframed the entire value proposition. They would lease devices for modest monthly fees, essentially inventing what Silicon Valley would later celebrate as "Software-as-a-Service" economics—though in this case, it was "Security-as-a-Service."

This shift created a market dynamic that transcended simple transaction economics. As adoption increased across Israel's urban centres, theft rates began declining in installation clusters. The network effect was real: deterrence improved as coverage expanded.

By 1998, with domestic operations generating predictable cash flows, international expansion beckoned. But here, the Sheratzkys demonstrated prescient geographic instinct. While competitors pursued the vast American market—where LoJack already dominated stolen vehicle recovery—Ituran targeted Latin America.

Argentina first, followed by Brazil. In São Paulo alone, vehicle theft exceeded 50,000 cases annually. But the deeper insight concerned market psychology: in regions where violent crime made security existential rather than discretionary, subscription services became non-negotiable expenses.

The Brazilian market, in particular, revealed the model's true power. With crime rates that made Israeli theft statistics look modest, and a growing middle class desperate for protection, Ituran found its perfect ecosystem. By 2024, Brazil would generate 25% of company revenues.

The 1999 acquisition of Tadiran Telematics completed a strategic circle. While modern technology companies pursue asset-light business models, Ituran embraced the opposite path. Manufacturing its hardware, training installers, operating recovery teams… vertical integration.

Three decades later, this philosophy persists. As competitors fragment into pure software players, Ituran continues operating as what might be called a "security utility"—providing not just tracking signals but the entire chain of recovery operations that deliver on its implicit promise. The company's recovery teams still navigate favela streets where local police hesitate, a testament to services that address reality's darker mathematics.

How do they make money

Ituran operates by transforming the universal anxiety of vehicle theft into a predictable monthly revenue stream—essentially, converting fear into cash flow.

This conversion happens through two simple mechanics: monthly subscriptions for tracking services, which deliver exactly $10-15 per vehicle per month regardless of whether anything ever happens to that car, and one-time hardware sales that create the infrastructure for those subscriptions. The elegant part is how these two revenue streams complement each other—hardware sales generate modest margins but lock customers into high-margin monthly payments that continue indefinitely.

The subscriber business operates with striking simplicity through dual revenue streams. Imagine a utility company, except instead of supplying electricity, it supplies certainty. Once the control centers are built and radio towers erected, adding another customer costs virtually nothing. The fixed infrastructure can handle millions of vehicles simultaneously, so each new subscription drops almost pure profit to the bottom line.

Here's where the business model becomes enticing with its near-zero marginal costs: most customers never actually need the recovery service they're paying for. In any given month, perhaps 0.1% of vehicles require active tracking, yet 100% of customers pay their fees. This creates what finance people call "float"—steady cash inflows with sporadic, predictable outflows. The mathematical beauty is that as the customer base grows, recovery costs per subscriber actually decrease due to network effects.

The hardware side reveals similar economic principles but with inverted dynamics that function as a hardware-as-annuity converter. These are loss-leaders in Israel, where devices sell for less than their production cost, yet become profit centers in Latin American markets through leasing arrangements. The strategy isn't selling trackers—it's recruiting subscribers.

The profit architecture relies on operating leverage—finance jargon for "fixed costs that stay fixed while revenues grow." Once you've built the network infrastructure, serving the first customer or the millionth customer requires roughly the same overhead. This explains why management projects $100 million in earnings from what appears to be modest growth: the difference between marginal cost and marginal revenue expands dramatically as scale increases.

Perhaps the most remarkable revenue dynamic involves … negative customer acquisition costs (CAC). Insurance companies, facing $50,000 claims on stolen vehicles, actively push their policyholders toward Ituran's $120 annual subscriptions. Banks protecting $30,000 auto loans subsidise installations. Police departments publicly endorse the service. The company has effectively made its target market pay for its own marketing—a rare business phenomenon that creates nearly frictionless growth.

The cash conversion cycle is also favourable. Customers typically pay monthly in advance (negative working capital), hardware components are purchased with 60-day payment terms, and recovery operations generate immediate cash settlements with insurance companies. This financing structure means the business generates cash faster than it consumes it, creating what Warren Buffett famously called "other people's money" working for the company.

This revenue architecture creates a business that behaves more like a financial institution than a technology company. The predictability of cash flows, the float generated from prepaid services, and the leverage effect of fixed infrastructure combine to create a machine that transforms social problems into shareholder returns.

Ituran doesn't solve car theft—it monetises the human response to it.

Numbers

Ituran's financial statements show exactly what you'd expect from a subscription tracking business. 2.4 million subscribers pump out $336 million annual revenue—roughly $140 per customer each year. Given we already covered how this cash machine works, let's dig into the numbers themselves.

The subscriber growth pattern grabbed headlines: 157,000 net additions in 2024 (to a total of 2,409,000) accelerated wildly from the usual 20,000-25,000 quarterly pace. That's 7% annual growth, with management projecting further acceleration to 180,000-200,000 new subscribers in 2025. In subscription businesses, this acceleration often signals market conditions turning in your favour.

Subscription margins hit 58.7% gross, improving from 57.9% last year. Translation: every dollar of subscription revenue drops 58 cents to the bottom line after covering direct costs. Since subscriptions make up 73% of revenue, this margin directly impacts profits. As mentioned earlier about operating leverage, each new subscriber costs almost nothing to serve after infrastructure is built.

The geographic numbers create obvious tension. Israel still brings in 52% of revenue while growing glacially at 2.5%. Brazil delivers 25% of revenue but explodes with 24% local currency growth. The math is obvious: Israel funds today's profits, Brazil promises tomorrow's growth.

Looking at the margins: EBITDA actually slipped from 27.2% to 27.1% despite growing revenue. That $91 million EBITDA converts into $74.3 million operating cash. This means their subscription model didn't suddenly start leaking cash—they're choosing to invest rather than optimise for short-term margins.

The balance sheet screams financial fortress. Net cash ballooned to $77.3 million while debt evaporated ($0.1 million). They added $23.9 million cash during 2024 alone—a 46% increase—while simultaneously boosting dividends 142%. Management is probably preparing for something bigger.

ROE clocks in at 30.4%—extraordinarily high for any sector. This comes from needing minimal capital to run the business, not financial engineering. When your main assets are software and radio towers rather than factories or inventory, you naturally generate higher returns.

Employee numbers validate the model: $116,400 revenue per employee shows where one operator can monitor thousands of vehicles. Compare that to businesses requiring one-to-one staffing. This productivity metric improved from last year's $112,700.

Capital expenditure stayed light at 4.1% of revenue ($13.6 million). This reflects mature market infrastructure, though it might lowball true capital needs when you factor in leased equipment.

The operating lease puzzle: $34 million in leased equipment across 2.4 million subscribers ($14 per device). Yet only $5.6 million shows as lease liability on books. The gap suggests substantial future obligations living off-balance-sheet. This wasn't accidental—it's a deliberate strategy balancing expansion flexibility with reported capital efficiency.

The cash cycle advantage couldn't be clearer: customers prepay monthly, suppliers wait 60 days, insurance companies pay immediately on recoveries. They essentially use other people's money to fund operations.

People

In most public companies, understanding who owns, runs, and benefits from the business involves navigating complex agency relationships. Transparency makes Ituran unusual: the people who built it still run it, and the people who run it still own meaningful chunks of it.

The multi-generational dynasty operates at its most pure. Izzy, now 79, founded the company with his son Eyal, then brought in his other sons Nir and Gil as the business scaled. Today, three generations occupy executive positions, with the fourth generation (Tal, Izzy's niece) sitting on the board. Far from empty nepotism, this represents calculated continuity that's paid off handsomely.

The hidden control structure exposes how family businesses can maintain command without majority stakes. The Sheratzkys directly own 8.44% of shares, but add the mysteriously named "Moked Ituran Ltd" (6.45%, almost certainly a family vehicle) and suddenly the picture changes.

American institutional money dominates the cap table with 58.73% ownership, rather than Israeli entities. Fidelity, Renaissance Technologies, and Vulcan Value Partners collectively control 17% of shares. This geographic mismatch creates interesting dynamics—U.S. institutions funding an Israeli family business predominantly serving Latin American customers.

The physical reality of Ituran's workforce defies its tech company label. Of 2,841 employees, a staggering 42% work in enforcement and operations—literally the people who chase stolen cars through dangerous neighbourhoods. Another 17% provide technical support, while only 6% work in R&D. This inverted pyramid structure means operations staff outnumber engineers by 7-to-1, giving us a business that's more about boots on the ground than code on servers. Despite technical complexity, the human element remains paramount when recovering vehicles from places police hesitate to enter.

The mandate-driven asymmetry shapes customer relationships. Insurance companies drive demand by requiring tracking devices, essentially outsourcing their theft prevention costs to car owners. Banks like Santander follow similar logic, mandating installation on financed vehicles. This triangulation—where those who pay aren't those who benefit from payments—creates powerful network effects that competitors struggle to replicate.

Behavioural psychology underpins the business model's foundation. At $10 monthly, the subscription creates what economists call "de minimis spending"—cheap enough that cancelling feels trivial even when the service goes unused. Yet aggregate these micro-payments across 2.4 million subscribers, and suddenly you're running a $336 million business.

The most interesting personnel insight? Outsized founder payouts remain excessive even by tech industry standards. Izzy Sheratzky pulled $2.2 million in 2023 despite serving as "President" rather than CEO. His sons Eyal and Nir each earned $1.7 million as Co-CEOs, while third-generation Gil managed $1.2 million running just a subsidiary. For context, the entire board compensation budget equals one-tenth of these payouts.

As Eyal noted, "as entrepreneurs we generate cash every quarter and we don't find the right target to acquire." The cash preservation approach becomes clear: compensating founders rather than pursuing dilutive acquisitions. In other terms: better to keep the money in the family than chase imaginary growth through overpriced deals.

The national pride investment completes this portrait. Beyond institutional holders, retail investors skew heavily Israeli. They're buying not just financial returns but homegrown success—investing in local technology that protects their daily reality. This possibly explains why the company maintains a 5% dividend yield despite opportunities for geographic expansion.

Competition & the Moat(?)

Ituran sells a product nobody wants to use and hope they'll never need. They compete to protect customers from criminals, thriving in markets most companies would abandon.

Israel gives Ituran their best deal—pure monopoly. The government lets them set prices, and with car theft hitting epidemic levels, everyone falls in line. Their "competitors" Pointer and Skylock exist just to check boxes for insurance companies. The math is simple: when insurers require tracking systems and one firm owns 80% of the market, pricing disappears as a competitive factor. But success breeds stagnation—they're running out of new customers to install devices on.

Brazil’s market flips the script entirely. This is where the real knife fight happens. Sascar, Zatix, and LoJack wage desperate wars for every account, mimicking small bistros fighting for the same dinner crowd. Israel resembles a Michelin-starred establishment with guaranteed bookings, while Brazil operates like street food vendors—slimmer profits, relentless innovation, and patrons who abandon you for minor savings. Yet while Israel throws off 52% of revenue effortlessly, the Latin American scraps only produce 25% of sales—but, that's where the growth is. Will it worth the effort?

Moving outside their strongholds gets exponentially harder. In America, GM's OnStar comes pre-installed, freezing out aftermarket players entirely. Europe? It's a regulatory maze where local players have home-court advantage. This is where Ituran's model faces its ultimate test: can they win without government backing or crisis-driven demand?

Scale economies manifest most powerfully through Ituran's subscriber advantage. Competitors bleed money spreading fixed costs across tiny customer pools. But this leverage doesn't travel—every new country demands rebuilding from zero. No global efficiency magic here.

Getting customers locked in works beautifully across their system. Insurers can't easily switch—too much integration work. The hardware creates financial handcuffs—technically removable, but who pays for replacement? And in Israel, becoming an installer requires months of certification. These barriers transcend technology—they're monetary constraints nearly as restrictive. Installer certification demands lengthy preparation, creating an ecosystem that resists disruption.

Vertical integration cuts both ways. Double-edged sword. Owning their manufacturer ERM saved them when chip shortages hammered competitors. But this control becomes an anchor when tech shifts. Modern competitors run lean software operations while Ituran funds R&D, factories, and installation networks. The fundamental question: does control beat agility?

Tech obsolescence awaits around the corner. Moving from 2G to modern networks means replacing millions of devices. Fresh competitors built on current infrastructure gain years of operational experience while Ituran faces massive hardware upgrades. Their pioneering radio network—brilliant for GPS-free tracking—risks becoming a museum piece before paying itself off.

Physical requirements create substantial financial burden intensifying competitive disparities. Annual hardware expenditures reach $14 million alongside expenses for extensive facilities and personnel networks. The gap widens painfully: as Ituran evaluates Brazilian station economics, competitors redirect equivalent funds toward customer growth. Infrastructure converts geographic movement from strategic opportunity to financial strain.

And the uncomfortable truth about Ituran's moat: they need crime to prosper. Beyond market opportunity, crime creates necessity and therefore a troubling dependency. When São Paulo loses 50,000+ cars yearly, tracking isn't optional—it's insurance table stakes. This inverts normal business dependencies: carriers need Ituran more than Ituran needs any single carrier. Success literally depends on social breakdown continuing.

Local expertise creates barriers money can't replicate. Recovery teams build decade-long operational knowledge—understanding neighbourhoods, optimising protocols, navigating underworld negotiations. New players can copy systems overnight but can't instantly import that street-level wisdom.

The reality: concentrated dominance usually beats diluted presence. Ituran needs to squeeze maximum profit from aligned markets, treating everything else as strategic options rather than core priorities.

Mr. Market

For most of 2024, Mr. Market appeared to view Ituran as a competent but uninspiring operator—the type of company that pays dividends while waiting for momentum. Trading in a fairly narrow band from $24-27, the stock showed remarkable stability despite consistent earnings beats. It's possible that investors had simply grown fatigued by the company's currency headwind narrative, choosing to discount both the warnings and the underlying business strength.

Currency fluctuations dominated the market narrative, with USD strength creating a persistent headwind on reported revenues despite robust local currency performance. We can discern this from the price pattern—subscriber growth hit the high end of guidance and net additions accelerated to 157,000 for the year, yet the stock remained range-bound. This disconnect suggests market participants were more focused on quarterly FX impacts than underlying business fundamentals.

After Q4 results were announced in late February 2025, however, the stock appreciated materially, moving from $26.05 to $41.52—a significant revaluation of approximately 33%. This shift came after management delivered full-year results exceeding expectations and raised 2025 subscriber guidance substantially.

Today's price of $35.74 represents a pullback from February's highs, which appears influenced by broader macro uncertainties. Reports of trade war concerns and US economic headwinds have created market volatility that affects companies like Ituran despite their focus on international markets. This current price translates to a P/E multiple of approximately 12.4x, suggesting markets now value Ituran as a quality business worthy of a premium to its historical trading range.

Bear Thesis

The 33% jump from ~$27 to ~$36 might reflect Wall Street's current love affair with Ituran's numbers. They've hit subscriber targets, Brazil's booming—all good headlines. But dig deeper, and you find the very partnerships celebrating today might obsolete them tomorrow. There are structural tensions brewing.

Insurance and bank partners have collected seven years of driver data through Ituran's systems. Sweet deal now, sure. But data gatherers who get too valuable have a nasty habit of getting cut out. Picture 2029—Israel kills 2G networks, forcing everyone to upgrade or build their own. These partners suddenly decide: do we pay Ituran indefinitely or just build this ourselves? Disintermediation. In a way, banking history repeats here: remember when lenders dumped credit bureaus for in-house models? Profit margins never recovered.

And then comes the geographic concentration issue. Brazil's 24% growth looks great until you examine the fine print. Santander's contract churns every 18 months, and Brazilian banking cycles turn ugly fast. Management's guiding for 180-200k net additions, but 2025-26 could see this reverse hard. Plus, the real/dollar exchange rate keeps moving against them—it's not theoretical risk, it's hitting numbers now. Has anyone stress-tested these forecasts against a Brazilian slowdown?

Leadership succession introduces another layer of uncertainty that current valuations may not fully capture. Izzy Sheratzky at 79 remains the strategic architect, with no obvious heir apparent among the three-generation executive roster. When octogenarian founders exit, stocks reprice—period. The apparent stability of family control masks the reality that institutional investors—holding 58.73% of shares—will likely demand governance clarity as succession approaches. This isn't catastrophic, but it introduces execution risk precisely when the company faces its most complex challenges.

The 2G-to-5G shift exposes how yesterday's strengths become today's problems. Vertical integration saved them during chip shortages—brilliant. But now they're stuck paying massive capex for legacy hardware while software competitors launch clean slates. That $14 million annual hardware budget? Probably understates true upgrade costs. Pure software rivals? Zero infrastructure burden.

These structural challenges are already in motion, not hypothetical futures. The investment decision turns on whether the current 12.4x P/E multiple adequately prices these transitions. No catastrophic failure is required—normal friction in executing partner relationships, geographic expansion, leadership succession, and technology migration could reasonably compress valuations. Monitoring partner renewals in 2026, Brazilian loan growth metrics, and any C-suite announcements will reveal whether today's optimism proves well-timed or premature. The numbers work beautifully until they don't, and these structural fault lines suggest the timing matters more than the if.

Bull Thesis

It's quite obvious that something fundamental is shifting at Ituran. While the market continues to price this as a sleepy utility paying dividends, the underlying reality points to a subscription machine approaching an inflection point.

The bull case hinges on three converging forces: accelerating business model transformation, deepening network economics at scale, and a persistent valuation anomaly that fails to appreciate the company's evolution from utility to growth story.

The acceleration speaks for itself: adding 157,000 net subscribers in 2024 already represented a dramatic compounding subscriber momentum from the historical 20,000-25,000 quarterly pace. Management's guide for 180-200k additions this year suggests momentum keeps building. They just crushed their own targets by adding 40,000 subscribers last quarter. This is compounding subscriber momentum that the current multiple ignores.

The network effects create a beautiful logic: more subscribers mean better recovery coverage, which deters crime more effectively, which drives more subscribers. When theft rings understand that Ituran's enforcement teams navigate neighbourhoods even police avoid, deterrence compounds across the entire subscriber base—creating self-reinforcing scale advantages that grow stronger with time.

The geographic mix shows strategic thinking, not risky concentration. Israel's monopoly gushes cash to fund Brazil's expansion—a strategic market cross-subsidisation cycle where mature markets bankroll growth until new territories hit their own monopoly positions. Management's "muddle-through" rhetoric masks disciplined capital allocation. They skip flashy M&A precisely because the core business delivers better returns.

Operating leverage starts getting interesting here. Infrastructure stays largely fixed whether you serve one million or three million subscribers. Each new subscription dollar converts to profit at nearly 60% margins. At this trajectory, hitting $100 million EBITDA isn't aspirational—it's inevitable. Fixed costs spreading across more subscribers drives expanding profit margins with mathematical certainty.

But the market values this at 12.4x P/E—a massive discount to subscription businesses typically commanding 20x+. This mispricing comes from forex noise (with hints of trade wars) hiding local performance and investors misreading the model entirely. They see vehicle tracking; they should see subscription economics compounding. This category error creates opportunity: when growth momentum becomes undeniable, multiple expansion follows inevitably.

There’s also a hidden unicorn that can potentially supercharge the bullish case. Ituran quietly holds a 17% stake in Bringg—a last-mile delivery platform that reached unicorn status in 2021—carried at $0 on their books but potentially worth $170 million. That's nearly a quarter of Ituran's market cap completely invisible to conventional analysis. This stake embodies their capital allocation philosophy: seed adjacent businesses, maintain strategic influence, and create shareholder value through patience rather than forced M&A. When Bringg eventually(?) monetises through acquisition or IPO, Ituran shareholders receive a windfall that today's 12.4x multiple utterly ignores. That’s some asymmetric upside right there.

Necessity-driven demand plus subscription scalability creates a compounding machine, not just growth. Yes, Brazil's competitive and tech transitions carry risk. But the risk-reward heavily favours investors here. Current valuations require perfect execution just to be fair value. The actual trend suggests they're exceeding even their own targets as baseline performance.

So what do we make of all this?

Ituran makes money when bad things happen. Their $700 million business doesn't grow when societies prosper—it feeds off crime and chaos. Look at their numbers honestly: their best quarters track directly with theft spikes. They're not betting on human nature's dark side—they've built a profit engine that runs on it.

This whole industry exists on a private profit from public failure. Police can't or won't stop car theft, creating room for private companies to cash in. Ituran sits exactly at that sweet spot—where government fails, they profit. When crime surges, their customer acquisition costs vanish. Insurance companies push their product. Banks make it mandatory for loans. Most companies would probably have ethical problems with this business model.

That said, execution-wise, Ituran has been brilliant. The Sheratzky family didn't just pivot from defence to consumer—they built a utility masquerading as tech. While rivals chase growth everywhere, Ituran squeezes more efficiency from existing operations. Subscription revenue converts at 60% to earnings. This is … pure leverage. Yet the market still prices them at utility multiples. Do they deserve more?

This also shows something about investor psychology. Some can't stomach making money off society's problems—it clashes with their values. Others see past the ethics to appreciate a business where demand rises with economic stress. Markets reward consistent profits, and what's more consistent than solving urgent problems that never go away?

Looking ahead, three scenarios emerge. One: they stay the course—Brazil generates cash, Israel provides pricing power, delivering 15-18% returns for investors who accept the moral trade-off. Two: the tech transition crushes them—upgrading 2.4 million devices to 5G wrecks their balance sheet. Three: they leverage their data goldmine—seven years of driving data could power proprietary AI for risk assessment. Speculative.

The darkest moats create the strongest positions. Their model works because crime doesn't get disrupted by tech cycles or economic downturns. It endures. Whether you buy it isn't just math—it's philosophy. Can you sleep knowing you're hoping crime never fully disappears? If yes, this is one of the few truly recession-proof businesses. If no, find another ticker.

In the end, they say investing reveals as much about who we are as it does about the companies we choose.

---

LEGAL DISCLAIMER AND DISCLOSURE

© 2025 Silba. All rights reserved.

This analysis is for informational purposes only. The content represents the views and opinions of the author, based on publicly available information. While we strive for accuracy, we make no representations or warranties regarding the completeness or accuracy of the information presented.

This analysis is not investment advice. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. The author may hold positions in securities mentioned. Future performance of any investment discussed cannot be guaranteed.

All financial figures, unless otherwise noted, are approximations based on publicly available information. Readers should verify all claims, statistics, and analytical processes independently. The information contained herein is not intended to be a complete analysis of any security, company, or industry mentioned.

Market conditions change. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investments mentioned may not be suitable for all investors. Readers should conduct their own due diligence and consult with professional financial, legal, and tax advisors before making any investment decisions.

By accessing this analysis, you agree that neither Silba nor its affiliates bear any responsibility for investment decisions you make based on this information.