[SFQ] SAF-Holland: Breaking Down Isn't An Option

In trucking, catastrophic failure costs more than premium components. Someone built a business model around that

Origins

The 1880s were a pivotal time in agriculture. Yes, farming; 150 years ago, stay with me. Consider this for a second: in 1880, it took about 20 hours of labour to produce one acre of wheat. By 1900, that same farmer with mechanized equipment could handle fifteen. 14.47% CAGR, if we’re counting. This explosion in agricultural productivity created an interesting problem: how do you move all that extra produce around?

Here comes Paul Zill, a German blacksmith who, in 1881, was tinkering with ploughs. He wanted to create something that could alternate directions - a two-way plough. His workshop grew into a real business, Otto Sauer Achsenfabrik (SAF), making increasingly complex agricultural equipment. As farmers adopted mechanical harvesters and early tractors, SAF adapted too, developing stronger axles to handle the growing loads. By 1938, they were mass-producing steel axles that could support the weight of industrial farming equipment. That’s the first half of the story.

Over in South Dakota, Gerrit Den Besten spotted a different opportunity in 1910. His Safety Release Clevis Company started with a clever invention - a safety hitch that would disconnect if a horse-drawn plough hit an obstacle. Pretty soon, his coupling devices were showing up on all sorts of farm equipment. When farmers started replacing horses with engines, Den Besten's company (by then renamed Holland Hitch after moving to Michigan) already knew everything about connecting heavy things to other heavy things. Their expertise in hitches and couplings translated perfectly to the emerging world of trucks and trailers. That’s the second half, we have the SAF and the Holland now.

The 1940s brought a revolution in road transport. Both companies saw which way the wind was blowing. SAF's robust axles found a new home under trailers. Holland's coupling technology evolved into fifth wheels and landing gear. They were solving the same problems they always had - how to make heavy things move efficiently - just with engines instead of horses.

Think about it as industrial expertise finding its perfect moment. When SAF and Holland merged in 2006, they were bringing together two companies that had spent decades solving complementary problems in commercial transport. Both had started with ploughs. Both had grown by understanding what their customers actually needed. And both had turned agricultural innovation into transport engineering expertise. Even today, that practical problem-solving DNA shows up in SAF-Holland's approach to innovation, from electronic braking systems to tire pressure management.

How do they make money

At its core, SAF-Holland makes the parts that keep trucks and trailers rolling - and more importantly, connected to each other. Keep in mind, trailers can be VERY heavy. 40 tons kind of heavy.

They sell axles, suspension systems, and fifth wheels (those circular plates that connect trucks to trailers, handling enough dynamic load to support a fully loaded cargo container while allowing articulation in three axes) to vehicle manufacturers and fleet operators; in a highly regulated safety market. Let's be real - nobody gets excited about axles and suspension systems. Until they fail.

The money-making engine works in two stages.

Stage one, they supply components directly to manufacturers building new trucks and trailers. Think of any major European or American truck brand - they're probably using SAF-Holland parts.

Stage two, every component they sell creates years of future revenue, because these parts eventually need replacement or maintenance.

"Core business model focuses on developing, producing and selling chassis-related components for trailers, semi-trailers and trucks, with a strong emphasis on aftermarket services that provide recurring revenue"

- 2023 Annual Report

That's why SAF-Holland has built a service network that spans from German Autobahns to Australian outback routes, because broken trucks don't exactly do Uber.

You might think this is just a parts business, but the reality runs deeper. While selling to manufacturers is the obvious sell, it's the aftermarket business that drives profitability. Original equipment contracts involve annual price negotiations and just-in-time delivery requirements - think "we need these exact axles at this exact factory by Tuesday." The aftermarket? That's where fleet operators pay premium for availability and reliability because downtime costs them thousands per day.

What makes this work? Three things:

One, these aren't commodity parts, they're safety-critical components that need to meet strict regulations (think ECE R13 in Europe, FMVSS 121 in the US, each requiring years of testing and certification).

Second, their global manufacturing footprint matches their customers' needs - when a Brazilian truck maker ramps up production, SAF-Holland can supply locally.

"We invested a lot of money and time in our personnel. It doesn't make any sense to cut costs now, let's say, in a way that then we will get a burden for future times"

- CEO Alexander Geis

Third, and most importantly, they've built an ecosystem that's hard to replicate. When a trailer needs repairs in Kazakhstan at 3 AM, having a nearby service point matters more than saving a few euros on the original axle price. The recent acquisition spree shows they're doubling down on this strategy, adding specialized products that plug right into their existing network.

Numbers

Let's get the tough numbers out front: Sales crashed 21.5% organically in Q3. The European trailer market dropped 25%, North America 31%. Yet somehow margins held at 9.8%. Which implies aftermarket does the heavy lifting.

You might wonder why they don't just focus entirely on aftermarket if it's more profitable. The answer lies in how the business builds: every new axle or fifth wheel sold creates years of future service revenue. Original equipment sales is revenue - but more importantly, it’s market share in tomorrow's repair business.

Their overall adjusted operating margin sits at 9.8%. For context, that's solid performance in commercial vehicle components, where margins often get squeezed between large manufacturers and rising material costs. They've maintained this through a brutal industry downturn.

That margin resilience comes with asterisks. Working capital runs at 16.4% of sales, slightly above their 15-16% target. This elevated level makes sense - keeping spare parts available across 12,000 service points requires inventory. Without recent acquisitions, they'd be at 15.2%.

Let’s look at the balance sheet. The recent acquisition spree (Haldex ,IMS Group, Tecma, Assali Stefen) pushed net debt to 1.9x EBITDA - just under their 2.0x ceiling.

Regional numbers expose structural market differences: Americas operations generate 11.1% margins versus 8.1% in Europe. Why can't European operations match American efficiency? Geography and infrastructure dictate different operational models. American trucking concentrates on interstate highways, creating natural service hubs. European transport spreads across a complex network of national routes, requiring more service points to serve the same revenue.

Free cash flow reveals sustainability. They convert over 100% of operating earnings into cash, generating €87 million in the last twelve months. This funds both acquisitions and a 5.2% dividend yield. But, they issued a €100M promissory note while paying €38.6M in dividends. Taking on debt to maintain dividends during a downturn raises questions.

R&D spending runs at 2% of sales. For context, auto suppliers transitioning to electric systems typically spend 4-6%. That gap matters when the industry faces electrification. Innovation seems to focus on incremental improvements in materials and electronics.

Finally, there's employees - 5,624 of them generating €350,284 in revenue each. Which takes us to the people component.

People

In most companies, ownership structure tells you who calls the shots. At SAF-Holland, it tells you who doesn't. The largest shareholder holds just 5.2% - JPMorgan Asset Management, if you're curious. Then you've got a lineup of European institutional heavyweights: TimesSquare Capital (5.19%), Universal-Investment (5.07%), Van Lanschot Kempen (5.07%). It's like a European institutional investors' cocktail party, just with more discussions about axle tolerances.

Running the show is Alexander Geis, CEO since 2019. His story is worth noting - started as a commercial clerk in 1992, worked through aftermarket operations for over a decade. When he talks about maintaining skilled workers through market cycles, it comes from seeing what happens when you don't. The management structure is remarkably lean - just Geis and CFO Frank Lorenz-Dietz at the top, with regional heads enjoying significant autonomy. Think federation, not empire.

Their 5,900-strong workforce splits between industrial employees (3,184), office staff (1,873), and temporary workers (661). When truck production dropped 20% last year, they protected their core workforce. Though that protection came with an interesting footnote: 543 people somehow disappeared from the payroll while management talked about stability. Meanwhile, their Glassdoor reviews read like a masterclass in "how to make engineers update their LinkedIn profiles". Worth noting.

The customer base splits into two distinct groups. Vehicle manufacturers need reliable components and precise delivery - they're reluctant partners who need SAF-Holland's quality but occasionally resent their pricing power. Then there's the aftermarket customers - fleet operators who'll specifically request SAF-Holland components because they've learned the hard way that cheaper alternatives cost more in the long run.

The investor base? As we said, mostly European institutions who understand industrial cycles. The ownership structure creates an interesting dynamic - high institutional ownership (44%) provides stability for long-term investment, while dispersed ownership (56%) keeps management honest on capital allocation. No controlling shareholder means they can maintain their aftermarket strategy without pressure to maximize short-term OEM margins.

Competition & the Moat(?)

Let’s take a look at the competition landscape.

Take BPW, SAF-Holland's most direct rival in Europe. They're like twins separated at birth - both make axles, both do suspensions, both remanufacture brake components. But BPW tends to be more focused on Europe, while SAF-Holland went global shopping, picking up Haldex for brakes and various regional players. We could say BPW stayed home to master the local market.

JOST is the interesting case - they overlap with SAF-Holland in fifth wheels and landing gear, but barely touch the axle business. They're competitors, but not exactly fighting over the same products.

Then there's Hendrickson in North America - they're the 800-pound gorilla in truck suspensions over there. SAF-Holland competes with them through a different playbook: while Hendrickson dominates OEM relationships, SAF-Holland built this massive aftermarket network. It's like competing with Walmart by running thousands of convenient neighborhood stores.

The technology race adds another layer. SAF-Holland bet big on electronic braking systems through Haldex (paying €307 million for that chess piece), while BPW partnered with PE-backed technology providers. JOST, meanwhile, seems more interested in mechanical innovations. It's like they're all playing the same game but betting on different future rule changes.

Here's the quirky part: in some regions, they're fierce competitors, while in others, they barely notice each other. In India, SAF-Holland is pushing hard with a new tech center, while BPW has a lighter footprint. In China, they're all trying to figure out how to compete with local players who have home-field advantage.

The aftermarket business is where it gets really messy. Everyone's fighting over a massive pool of trucks and trailers that need parts, but success depends on having the right part in the right place at the right time. SAF-Holland's recent acquisitions of regional distributors suggest they're trying to solve this puzzle through ownership rather than partnerships.

It’s less of a direct competition and more like a complex ecosystem where each player has carved out their specialties while occasionally stepping on each other's toes. SAF-Holland's strategy seems to be "buy what we can't build". It's expensive but gives them control. Whether that proves smarter than BPW's more focused approach or JOST's selective competition - well, that's what makes earnings seasons entertaining.

Now, about those defensive moats. The thing every investor loves talking about, especially when they're not quite sure if there is one. Let's think about SAF-Holland's competitive position with appropriate skepticism.

The traditional argument would be their global scale and distribution network. But here's the catch - BPW and JOST also have extensive networks.

Their technical expertise? Well, they just spent €307 million buying Haldex because they needed better brake system technology. That's not exactly screaming "insurmountable technical advantage." Though it does suggest they're good at recognizing what they lack and fixing it with their checkbook.

But there might be something interesting in their system integration capability. When you're making axles talk to brakes talk to suspension systems talk to electronic controls - that's complex stuff. The Haldex acquisition suddenly makes more sense in this light - it's about completing the conversation.

Then there's the regulatory angle. Getting certified for safety-critical components in multiple regions isn't trivial. SAF-Holland has this sorted in Europe, Americas, and increasingly Asia. That's not exactly a moat, but it's at least a decent-sized ditch that takes time and money to cross.

The aftermarket business might be their cleverer play. Once your components are on a trailer, you've got a pretty good shot at the replacement parts business. It's the good old selling printers and ink playbook.

Their margins though, aren't exactly screaming "unassailable competitive position." The best companies with real moats tend to convert their advantage into pricing power. SAF-Holland's margins are... fine. Good even. But not "we can charge whatever we want" good.

So maybe it's more accurate to say they have a collection of competitive advantages that add up to something meaningful, rather than one big beautiful moat.

The real test will be whether they can maintain their position as vehicle electrification and autonomous systems reshape the industry.

Mr. Market

Anyone looking at SAF-Holland's chart first notices something odd: a 33% plunge from €19.50 to €13 between August and November 2024. Why would a company making heavy-duty truck parts - not exactly a speculative tech stock - move like that?

The answer involves three colliding stories.

First, the commercial vehicle market cooled faster than expected. When SAF-Holland cut 2024 sales guidance from €2.0B to €1.95B in November, the market decided this was the start of a brutal cycle.

Second, rising rates made investors especially jumpy about anything automotive-adjacent.

Third, the market initially misread their acquisition strategy as desperate rather than opportunistic.

Let's track how Mr. Market processed all this. The stock spent early 2024 around €19, with investors focusing on margin resilience and aftermarket stability. Summer brought reality checks about truck demand, sending the stock on a steady decline. The November guidance cut triggered real panic - volumes spiked as traders who viewed this as a pure cyclical rushed for exits.

Then something changed. The stock found support at €13, right around 8x earnings. That's when longer-term investors apparently started doing math: even if new trailer sales drop 25%, the installed base still needs parts. The stock has since climbed back to €15.62, though with notably lower trading volumes.

Today's valuation shows a market still arguing with itself. The 8.87x P/E suggests deep skepticism about growth. But the 5.2% dividend yield implies strong cash generation. It's as if the market can't decide whether to price this as a cyclical manufacturer (low multiple) or a recurring revenue business (higher multiple).

Recent trading patterns add nuance. The stock now sits above key moving averages but faces resistance around €16. That's technical speak for "investors think the worst is over but aren't yet convinced about growth." Each piece of positive news - like maintaining 10% margins despite the revenue drop - gets cautious rather than enthusiastic buying.

The market might be overthinking the cycle and underthinking the structure. Yes, new trailer orders are down sharply. But SAF-Holland's actual results - steady margins, solid cash flow, controlled leverage - suggest their business model works in both boom and bust. The current price implies either earnings will collapse (which would require margins to crack) or the market hasn't fully processed how aftermarket revenues compound over time.

Basically, at current prices, the market is valuing SAF-Holland like a traditional auto supplier facing peak-to-trough declines. That might make sense if their only business was selling parts to manufacturers. But when every axle and fifth wheel they sell creates years of future service revenue, the math changes.

Bear Thesis

When your revenue drops 21.5% organically in Q3 and you respond by buying three companies, something's not adding up. SAF-Holland calls this a cyclical downturn. Maybe. But let's look at some numbers.

Start with what they're not saying: factoring - selling customer invoices for immediate cash - dropped from €40.4 million to €28.7 million while receivables climbed. Translation? They're extending more credit to customers who are taking longer to pay. That's not what you do in a typical downturn unless you have to.

Their workforce shrunk by 543 people while CEO Geis claimed in the Q3 call: "We invested a lot of money and time in our personnel... we try to keep personnel as long as on board as possible." Actions meet words, and actions are winning.

The acquisition timing deserves a raised eyebrow. They bought IMS Group, Tecma, and Assali Stefen right as European trailer production crashed 25% and U.S. trailers dropped 31%. Consolidating in a declining market is like buying three houses on the same street just as property values plummet - you might get good prices, but timing matters.

Their geographic footprint? SAF-Holland's market exposure: 87% of Q3 sales come from EMEA and Americas, both experiencing double-digit declines (12.3% and 26.5% respectively). China continues providing more red ink than revenue, while India demonstrates why emerging market exposure is a double-edged sword - record performance in 2023 followed by election-induced spending freezes and an unusually disruptive monsoon season.

Let's talk R&D. They spend 2% of sales. The auto suppliers successfully transitioning from mechanical to electronic systems? They typically spend 4-6%. SAF-Holland's new tech center in India sounds great, but the numbers suggest they're bringing a pocket calculator to a quantum computing race.

The debt moves raise red flags. They issued a €100 million promissory note while paying €38.6 million in dividends. In banking terms, that's like taking out a mortgage to pay for your yacht club membership during a recession.

Warranty provisions hit €27.7 million - money set aside for expected product failures. It's rising. For context, when you make components that keep trailers safely connected to trucks at highway speeds, rising warranty costs mean something's wrong in quality control.

Employee reviews average 3.4/5.0 on Glassdoor. The consistent theme? "Management was awful" and "under market rates for hourly employees." When your competitive advantage depends on engineering precision, unhappy engineers are a problem.

Then there's the €7.8 million in Q3 currency losses. Global business requires currency hedging - converting future foreign revenues into today's guaranteed home currency rates. These losses suggest they're either bad at it or can't afford proper hedging anymore.

Their old moat - certification barriers in mechanical components - looks more like a shallow pond as the industry electrifies. Yes, they're developing e-axles. But at 2% R&D spending, they're bringing a spoon to a knife fight.

More importantly, SAF-Holland's management discovered, three times in 2024, that their crystal ball needed calibration. Their communication strategy evolved from 'everything's fine' to 'market conditions require adjustments' - standard executive-speak for 'this is worse than we thought.' But in a year when your key markets crater by 20-30%, perhaps the real surprise is anyone pretending to know what comes next.

The bear case isn't so much about imminent doom. It's more about a company trying to maintain appearances - through acquisitions, reduced factoring, and debt-funded dividends - while their core business faces fundamental disruption. The market hasn't noticed. Physics suggests it will.

Bull Thesis

When a truck's fifth wheel fails at highway speeds, what follows will be ugly and painful. That's why the commercial vehicle industry runs on different rules than your typical manufacturing business. Cost-cutting might work for coffee makers, but not for components keeping tons of cargo safely connected at 70 mph.

This gets at the heart of why SAF-Holland's business works better than you'd think. When your products need to perform perfectly every time - through rain, snow, and whatever else truckers encounter - traditional industrial logic starts breaking down. Think of it like an iceberg. Above the water, you see a company selling axles and suspension systems. The real story lurks beneath: a combination of technical barriers, regulatory moats, and recurring revenues that would make Warren Buffett nod approvingly.

Let's start with those technical barriers. Getting a new component certified under European ECE R13 or American FMVSS 121 standards requires years of testing under every possible condition. Once a manufacturer designs their vehicles around your components, switching suppliers means redesigning entire systems and redoing all that certification. Let’s just say it’s improbable.

The aftermarket segment now delivers 39.7% of sales, with margins that make standard manufacturing look quaint. As CEO Geis points out,

where OE was down 30%, 40%, aftermarket is very stable.

Simple economics: when fleet operators delay new purchases, those existing trucks and trailers need more attention, not less.

The company has built a network of 12,000 service points globally. That number is the difference between a broken-down truck getting fixed in Brazil at 4 in the morning or sitting idle for days. When your truck isn't moving, you're losing thousands per day. Suddenly, paying a premium for components with reliable service backup makes perfect business sense.

Speaking of service, let's look at the financials, because they show something important about business quality. As we said, in Q3 2024, despite organic sales dropping 21.5%, operating margins held at 9.8%. That's not supposed to happen in a cyclical manufacturing business. It suggests there's more to this story than just making metal parts.

Management keeps investing through the cycle too. Their new tech center in India represents a shift from pure hardware to predictive systems. Think less "metal bending" and more "let's catch problems before they strand a driver in the Alps." Their e-axle technology has already logged 2.7 million kilometers of testing.

This dynamic gets more interesting in the current geopolitical environment. Consider the potential Trump tariffs that have markets nervous. For SAF-Holland, with manufacturing spread across Canada, U.S., and Mexico under NAFTA, this could actually accelerate the trend of production moving into their regional network. Sometimes what looks like a headwind at first glance becomes a tailwind when you understand the operational details.

And they're doing this with a solid balance sheet - net debt to EBITDA of 1.9x, below their 2.0x target. That's after completing several strategic acquisitions that broaden their technical capabilities. The recent EUR 100 million promissory note placement suggests capital markets remain quite comfortable with their financial position.

Look at October's order intake - surprisingly better than the previous three months, especially in European trailers. Infrastructure spending is resuming post-elections in India. Their China operations are finally turning profitable. These are the kinds of green shoots that tend to matter.

None of this means SAF-Holland is immune to cycles - they're not. But cycles matter less when you have:

1. Products that absolutely have to work

2. Years of testing and certification barriers

3. A global service network that's hard to replicate

4. Growing recurring revenue from aftermarket

5. Solid balance sheet to play offense when others can't

That's a pretty good recipe for compounding capital through cycles. The market's focus on near-term volume weakness might be missing the forest for the trees.

So what do we make of all this?

SAF-Holland operates in a world where component failure means 40 tons of trailer might decide to part ways with its truck at highway speeds. That tends to focus minds on quality rather than cost.

They've built this into a neat business model: sell safety-critical components, then generate steady service revenue across a global service network. Even in downturns, the formula works well enough to maintain solid margins.

The bears see three red flags: buying companies while extending customer credit (usually not a "business is great" signal), spending barely half what peers do on R&D while the industry electrifies, and warranty provisions creeping up. They argue SAF-Holland is using acquisitions and debt-funded dividends to paper over cracks while the industry evolves. The reduced factoring and rising receivables suggest customers are taking longer to pay, which in manufacturing typically precedes other problems.

Bulls point to pricing power and margin resilience through cycles. With manageable debt levels and steady cash generation, they maintain flexibility to invest through downturns. The recent acquisitions strengthen their technical capabilities right as infrastructure spending resumes in key markets.

Digging deeper reveals an interesting tech center strategy that markets might be missing. They're building a global software and predictive maintenance backbone, linking development in India, electronics expertise from Haldex in Sweden, and integration in Germany. This could transform their aftermarket business from fixing broken trucks to preventing breakdowns. That's the kind of transition that tends to improve margins. AI buzzwords incoming?

However, there's also that persistent China problem nobody wants to talk about. Operations there remain "dilutive" (corporate-speak for "losing money") despite years of fixes. As Chinese competitors strengthen, it’s less about profitability and more about a strategic risk. They need China for manufacturing and global contracts, but there's no clear fix in sight.

Current valuations suggest the market sees a cyclical manufacturer rather than a recurring revenue business. The stock's recent adventures indicate investors can't quite decide what they're looking at.

Looking ahead, three paths emerge: They successfully leverage their service network into electrified components while maintaining traditional market share (pushing margins up), they adapt gradually while facing some pressure (maintaining current levels), or they struggle to transition while facing rising R&D costs (compression).

The core question for investors: Does SAF-Holland's deep entrenchment in traditional commercial vehicle components represent an enduring competitive advantage or a liability as the industry evolves? The market seems uncertain. The data shows both resilience and vulnerabilities. Their execution on R&D investment and recent acquisitions over the next 12-18 months should provide clearer direction.

---

LEGAL DISCLAIMER AND DISCLOSURE

© 2025 Silba. All rights reserved.

This analysis is for informational purposes only. The content represents the views and opinions of the author, based on publicly available information. While we strive for accuracy, we make no representations or warranties regarding the completeness or accuracy of the information presented.

This analysis is not investment advice. It is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. The author may hold positions in securities mentioned. Future performance of any investment discussed cannot be guaranteed.

All financial figures, unless otherwise noted, are approximations based on publicly available information. Readers should verify all claims, statistics, and analytical processes independently. The information contained herein is not intended to be a complete analysis of any security, company, or industry mentioned.

Market conditions change. Past performance is not indicative of future results. Investments mentioned may not be suitable for all investors. Readers should conduct their own due diligence and consult with professional financial, legal, and tax advisors before making any investment decisions.

By accessing this analysis, you agree that neither Silba nor its affiliates bear any responsibility for investment decisions you make based on this information.